Pendekatan Konstruktivisme untuk Meningkatkan Kolaborasi Mahasiswa
Keywords:
Constructivism,Collaborative Learning, Student Collaboration, Higher Education, Active LearningAbstract
This article aims to explore various ways constructivism can help students collaborate in college learning. Traditional teaching methods remain a major issue in this research. This method makes students passive recipients of information, which hinders interaction and group work. Using a literature study methodology, this research investigates a number of scientific articles published between 2010 and 2024. These articles were found thru the Google Scholar, ScienceDirect, Scopus, and ERIC databases. The research results indicate that the constructivist approach has the ability to enhance social interaction among students, active learning mechanisms, group discussions, and opportunities for independent knowledge construction. Additionally, research has shown that strategies such as problem-based learning, project-based learning, and inquiry-based learning, which are based on constructivism, have the potential to create a conducive learning environment. Furthermore, previous research has indicated that strategies like problem-based learning, project-based learning, and inquiry-based learning, rooted in constructivism, have the capacity to foster a more collaborative and participatory learning environment. Therefore, this research confirms that the constructivist approach is a useful theoretical foundation for promoting student collaboration and supporting 21st-century skills.
Keywords: Constructivism,Collaborative Learning, Student Collaboration, Higher Education, Active Learning
Abstrak
Artikel ini beertujuan untuk mempelajari berbagai cara konstruktivisme dapat membantu siswa bekerja sama dalam pembelajaran di perguruan tinggi. Metode pembelajaran tradisional masih menjadi masalah utama dalam penelitian ini. Metode ini membuat siswa menjadi penerima informasi pasif, yang menghambat interaksi dan kerja sama kelompok. Menggunakan metodologi studi literatur, penelitian ini menyelidiki sejumlah artikel ilmiah yang dipublikasikan antara tahun 2010 dan 2024. Artikel-artikel ini ditemukan melalui basis data Google Scholar, ScienceDirect, Scopus, dan ERIC. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pendekatan konstruktivisme memiliki kemampuan untuk meningkatkan interaksi sosial antar siswa, mekanisme pembelajaran aktif, diskusi kelompok, dan kesempatan untuk membangun pengetahuan secara mandiri. Selain itu, penelitian telah menunjukkan bahwa strategi seperti pembelajaran berbasis masalah, pembelajaran berbasis proyek, dan pembelajaran berbasis pertanyaan yang berbasis konstruktivisme memiliki kemampuan untuk menciptakan lingkungan pembelajaran yang kondusif. Selain itu, penelitian sebelumnya telah menunjukkan bahwa strategi seperti pembelajaran berbasis masalah, pembelajaran berbasis proyek, dan pembelajaran berbasis pertanyaan berbasis konstruktivisme memiliki kemampuan untuk menciptakan lingkungan belajar yang lebih kolaboratif dan partisipatif. Oleh karena itu, penelitian ini menegaskan bahwa pendekatan konstruktivisme merupakan landasan teoretis yang berguna untuk mendorong kolaborasi siswa dan mendukung kemampuan abad ke-21.
Kata kunci: Konstruktivisme, Pembelajaran Kolaboratif, Kolaborasi Mahasiswa, Pendidikan Tinggi, Pembelajaran Aktif.
Downloads
References
Aditomo, A. (2019). Pembelajaran kolaboratif dalam pendidikan tinggi. Jurnal Pendidikan Tinggi Indonesia, 8(2), 112–125. https://doi.org/10.26877/jpti.v8i2.2019.
Aldrich, H. (2020). Collaborative learning and higher-order thinking. Journal of Learning Sciences, 29(4), 455–472. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2020.1769689.
Anderson, T. (2023). Digital collaboration in higher education: A systematic review. International Journal of Educational Technology, 14(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/ijedtech.2023.14001.
Bada, S. O., & Olusegun, S. (2015). Constructivism learning theory: A paradigm for teaching and learning. Journal of Research & Method in Education, 5(6), 66–70. https://doi.org/10.9790/7388-05616670.
Brame, C. J. (2016). Active learning increases student performance in STEM. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 15(3), 45–56. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.16-03-0135.
Dooly, M. (2017). Telecollaboration and virtual teamwork in higher education. Language Learning & Technology, 21(1), 20–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/llt.2017.21012.
Garrison, D. R., & Vaughan, N. (2008). Blended learning in higher education: Framework, principles, and guidelines. Jossey-Bass.
Hmelo-Silver, C. E., & Barrows, H. S. (2008). Facilitating collaborative knowledge building. Educational Psychologist, 43(1), 10–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/0046152070175637.
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2018). Cooperative learning: The foundation for active social interdependence. American Psychologist, 73(4), 584–602. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000242.
Kim, C., & Park, S. (2020). Student collaboration and engagement in online learning environments. Computers & Education, 157, 103956. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103956.
Kirschner, P. A. (2018). The challenges of collaborative learning. Educational Psychologist, 53(4), 248–262. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2018.1469412.
Levy, P. (2021). Enhancing peer collaboration through constructivist pedagogy. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 18(5), 45–60. https://doi.org/10.53761/jutlp.v18i5.2021.
Lin, X., & Lehman, J. (2019). Supporting student collaboration in online environments. Computers in Human Behavior, 92, 79–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.10.025.
McLeod, S. (2019). Constructivism as a learning theory: An overview. Educational Psychology Review, 31(1), 245–260. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-018-0945-5.
Nguyen, L. (2022). Challenges in implementing collaborative learning in universities. Higher Education Review, 54(3), 337–357. https://doi.org/10.1080/00181523.2022.1885123.
OECD. (2020). 21st-century skills and collaborative problem solving. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/edu2020-2.
Slavin, R. E. (2014). Cooperative learning and academic achievement. Educational Research Review, 5(2), 102–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2014.05.002.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (2021). Scaffolding revisited: Social interaction in collaborative learning. Instructional Science, 49(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-020-09531-3
Zhou, M., & Brown, D. (2015). Educational learning theories. University of Georgia Press.
Downloads
-
PDF FULL TEXT
Abstract Dilihat : 6 Kali , Download: 3 Kali
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Aida Nurindah Silalahi, Agus Lestari (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
