Pengembangan Fitur Lembar Triase Obstetri dalam Rekam Medis Elektronik (RME) Menggunakan OTAS di PONEK RS Tipe B di Kota Cimahi

Authors

  • Darmayanti Author

Keywords:

: OTAS, Obstetrical Triage, EMR, PONEK, Maternal Emergency, Digital Innovation.

Abstract

Maternal emergencies require a triage system that is specific, rapid, and accurately documented to reduce maternal and neonatal mortality. However, most hospitals still use general triage systems that are not tailored to obstetric complexity, and electronic medical records (EMRs) often lack dedicated obstetrical triage features. This study aimed to develop a digital obstetrical triage form based on the Obstetrical Triage Acuity Scale (OTAS) integrated into the EMR system of the PONEK unit at B-Type Hospital in Cimahi City. This research employed a Research and Development (R&D) approach using the PPE (Planning, Production, Evaluation) model. The planning stage involved observation and focus group discussions. A prototype triage feature was developed for three categories: early pregnancy, late pregnancy, and postpartum. The evaluation phase included content validity assessment, system feasibility testing, and user satisfaction evaluation. The prototype enabled input of clinical data and automatic OTAS scoring, fully integrated into the hospital’s EMR. Content validity index (CVI) scores reached 1.00, indicating high validity. System feasibility was rated at 87.5% (very feasible), and user satisfaction averaged 4.4 out of 5. The OTAS-based obstetrical triage feature is valid, feasible, and well-received. It enhances clinical decision-making, documentation accuracy, and triage efficiency in maternal emergency care.

ABSTRAK. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengembangkan fitur lembar triase obstetri dalam Rekam Medis Elektronik (RME) menggunakan pendekatan Obstetrical Triage Acuity Scale (OTAS) di ruang PONEK RS Tipe B di Kota Cimahi. Desain penelitian menggunakan metode Research and Development (R&D) model PPE (Planning, Production, Evaluation). Tahapan perancangan dilakukan melalui FGD dengan tenaga medis dan IT rumah sakit untuk menggali kebutuhan sistem triase obstetri. Tahap produksi menghasilkan prototype fitur triase yang terdiri dari kategori kehamilan (awal, lanjut, dan pascapersalinan) dengan integrasi skoring otomatis OTAS. Tahap evaluasi dilakukan melalui uji validitas isi, kelayakan sistem, dan kepuasan pengguna. Hasil menunjukkan validitas isi tinggi (S-CVI = 1.00), kelayakan sistem sebesar 87.5% (sangat layak), dan kepuasan pengguna rata-rata 4.4 dari 5. Fitur ini mendukung keputusan klinis cepat, dokumentasi akurat, dan efisiensi pelayanan maternal di PONEK.

Kata Kunci: OTAS, RME, Triase Obstetri, Kegawatdaruratan Maternal, PONEK, R&D PPE

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

AWHONN. (2020). Standards for Professional Nursing Practice in the Care of Women and Newborns (8th ed.). Washington, DC: Association of Women’s Health, Obstetric and Neonatal Nurses.

Baraki, Z., Girmay, F., Kidanu, K., Gerensea, H., Gezehgne, D., Teklay, H., & Teklay, H. (2017). Experience of obstetric triage among maternity care providers in public hospitals of Tigray region, Ethiopia: A qualitative study. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 17(1), 294. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-017-1491-6

British Columbia OTAS Guidance. (2021). Obstetrical Triage Acuity Scale Guidelines. Perinatal Services BC. http://www.perinatalservicesbc.ca/Documents/Guidelines

CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services). (2018). Electronic Health Records Overview. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. https://www.cms.gov

Cosgrove, C. M., Usakoski, T. L., Frey, H., & Shellhaas, C. (2016). An obstetrical triage acuity scale does not predict hospital admission. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 127(Supplement 1), 15S.

Creswell, J. W. (2017). Research design: Pendekatan metode kualitatif, kuantitatif, dan campuran (4th ed.). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Gratton, R. J., Bazaracai, N., Cameron, I., Watts, N., Brayman, C., Hancock, G., ... & Smithson, D. S. (2016). Acuity assessment in obstetrical triage. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada, 38(2), 125–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogc.2015.12.010

Greenhalgh, T., Robert, G., Macfarlane, F., Bate, P., & Kyriakidou, O. (2004). Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: Systematic review and recommendations. Milbank Quarterly, 82(4), 581–629. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0887-378X.2004.00325.x

Kementerian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia. (2009). Undang-Undang Nomor 44 Tahun 2009 tentang Rumah Sakit. Jakarta: Kemenkes RI.

Kementerian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia. (2022). Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan Republik Indonesia Nomor 24 Tahun 2022 tentang Rekam Medis. Jakarta: Kemenkes RI.

Kruse, C. S., Stein, A., Thomas, H., & Kaur, H. (2017). The use of electronic health records to support population health: A systematic review of the literature. Journal of Medical Systems, 42(11), 214. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-018-1075-6

Mednikoff, S. (2022). The importance of nursing documentation: A comprehensive guide. MAS Medical Staffing. https://www.masmedicalstaffing.com/blog/the-importance-of-nursing-documentation-a-comprehensive-guide/

Moleong, L. J. (2017). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif (Edisi revisi). Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Moudi, A., Iravani, M., Najafian, M., Zareiyan, A., Forouzan, A., & Mirghafourvand, M. (2020). Exploring the concept and structure of obstetric triage: A qualitative content analysis. BMC Emergency Medicine, 20(1), 74. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12873-020-00369-0

Nielsen, J. (1994). Usability engineering. Boston: Academic Press.

Nursalam. (2011). Manajemen keperawatan: Aplikasi dalam praktik keperawatan profesional (Edisi 2). Jakarta: Salemba Medika.

O’Rourke, K., Cameron, C. A., Baerlocher, M. O., & Karimuddin, A. A. (2018). Improving patient handovers: Implementing electronic triage tools. Healthcare Quarterly, 21(1), 20–27. https://doi.org/10.12927/hcq.2018.25460

Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2006). The content validity index: Are you sure you know what's being reported? Critique and recommendations. Research in Nursing & Health, 29(5), 489–497. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20147

Rashidi Fakari, F., Simbar, M., Zadeh Modares, S., & Alavi Majd, H. (2019). Obstetric triage scales: A narrative review. Archives of Academic Emergency Medicine, 7(1), e13.

Richey, R. C., & Klein, J. D. (2009). Design and development research: Methods, strategies, and issues. New York: Routledge.

Smithson, D. S., Twohey, R., Rice, T., Watts, N., & Gratton, R. J. (2013). Implementation and evaluation of an obstetrical triage acuity scale in a tertiary hospital. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada, 35(7), 682–689.

Sugiyono. (2017). Metode penelitian kombinasi (mix methods). Bandung: Alfabeta.

Tukisi, K. P., Temane, A., & Nolte, A. (2022). The midwives’ experiences of the use of obstetric triage and obstetric triage tool during labour in Bojanala district. Health SA Gesondheid, 27, 1758. https://doi.org/10.4102/hsag.v27i0.1758

World Health Organization. (2015). WHO recommendations on health information systems for quality of maternal and newborn care in health facilities. Geneva: WHO.

World Health Organization. (2016). Standards for improving quality of maternal and newborn care in health facilities. Geneva: WHO.

Downloads

Published

2025-09-04