Kepemimpinan Pendidikan dalam Perubahan Dinamis: Telaah Konseptual antara Kepemimpinan dan Manajemen Lembaga Pendidikan Kontemporer
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.66914/nbkf2k22Keywords:
Keywords: educational leadership, educational management, dynamic change, institutional effectivenessAbstract
Abstract
Educational leadership has become a critical issue during periods of dynamic change, as educational institutions face policy shifts, digital transformation, accountability demands, quality expectations, and increasingly complex governance. Previous studies have examined transformational, instructional, adaptive, and distributed leadership. However, these discussions often remain fragmented and do not sufficiently integrate the fundamental concepts of educational leadership and management. This study analyzes how these concepts explain the role of educational leadership in responding to dynamic change and how the integration of leadership and management can strengthen institutional effectiveness. It employed a qualitative conceptual design through a literature review of relevant academic sources. Data were collected through literature searching, selection, critical reading, concept mapping, thematic classification, and reference organization. The data were analyzed using conceptual content analysis by identifying key concepts, grouping themes, comparing theoretical perspectives, and synthesizing relationships among concepts. The findings show that educational leadership should be understood as an adaptive and systemic practice that integrates vision, values, strategy, governance, communication, collaboration, data-informed decision-making, teacher development, and continuous evaluation. This study recommends strengthening an integrative educational leadership and management framework and conducting further empirical research across different types of educational institutions.
Downloads
References
Bank, W. (2024). Improving teachers and school leadership in Indonesia: Impact evaluation of Guru Penggerak Program at the primary level. World Bank. https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/099042224202520319/pdf/P17481518584b50aa1b6821291769b3ffb7.pdf
Bush, T. (2020). Theories of educational leadership and management (5th ed.). SAGE. https://books.google.com/books/about/Theories_of_Educational_Leadership_and_M.html?id=-srXDwAAQBAJ
Charteris, J., Nye, A., Davis, K., & Ridolfo, H. (2026). Leading schools in crisis contexts: Practice insights from a scoping review. Educational Management Administration & Leadership. https://doi.org/10.1177/17411432261442355
Hallinger, P. (2013). A conceptual framework for systematic reviews of research in educational leadership and management. Journal of Educational Administration, 51(2), 126–149. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578231311304670
Huang, L., Zhao, D., & Zhou, S. (2024). Examining principal instructional leadership effects on the rural-urban instructional quality gap in China: The mechanism of teacher professional learning. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 81, 101346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2024.101346
Hulsbos, F., Andersen, I., & Kools, Q. (2025). Distributed leadership in action: Different manifestations and what they require from school leaders. British Educational Research Journal. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.4142
Jaakkola, E. (2020). Designing conceptual articles: Four approaches. AMS Review, 10(1–2), 18–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13162-020-00161-0
Long, Y., & Xia, Y. (2025). Leveraging transformational and instructional leadership for teacher professional development: A dual-mediation model of teacher self-efficacy and organisational culture. Teaching and Teacher Education, 164, 105087. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2025.105087
Mertkan, S., & Gümüş, S. (2026). Review of systematic reviews in educational leadership and management: Methods used, topics explored and geographies covered. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 54(3), 693–721. https://doi.org/10.1177/17411432241291197
Mincu, M. (2022). Why is school leadership key to transforming education? Structural and cultural assumptions for quality education in diverse contexts. Prospects, 52(3–4), 231–242. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-022-09625-6
Mincu, M. (2024). Governance mechanisms, school principals and the challenge of personalized education in contexts. Prospects, 54, 103–119. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-023-09663-8
Pietsch, M., & Mah, D.-K. (2025). Leading the AI transformation in schools: It starts with a digital mindset. Educational Technology Research and Development, 73(2), 1043–1069. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-024-10439-w
Retnawati, L., Egar, N., & Br Ginting, R. (2025). The Influence of Principal’s Instructional Leadership, Infrastructure, and Teacher Professional Development on the Quality of Learning in Senior High School. Electronic Journal of Education, Social Economics and Technology, 6(1), 375–381. https://doi.org/10.33122/ejeset.v6i1.557
Rojas-Bravo, J., Fromm, G., & Carrasco-Ogaz, D. (2024). School conditions and principal practices promoting instructional data use in high-stakes accountability systems. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 83, 101399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2024.101399
Sahlin, S., Sjöstrand, M., Styf, M., & Lund, S. (2025). Swedish principals’ adaptive leadership in unprecedented times: Learnings from the pandemic experiences. Educational Management Administration & Leadership. https://doi.org/10.1177/17411432251339791
Schiuma, G., Santarsiero, F., Carlucci, D., & Jarrar, Y. (2024). Transformative leadership competencies for organizational digital transformation. Business Horizons, 67(4), 425–437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2024.04.004
Shapiro, J. P., & Stefkovich, J. A. (2021). Ethical leadership and decision making in education: Applying theoretical perspectives to complex dilemmas (5th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003022862
Sharma, A., S, D., Vij, M. K., Singh, S., & Dhiman, T. (2025). Integrating Managerial Principles in Educational Leadership: A Strategic Approach to Enhancing Institutional Effectiveness. Open Access Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 1(4), 38–56. https://doi.org/10.47760/oajmr.2025.v01i04.003
Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039
UNESCO. (2024). Global education monitoring report 2024/5: Leadership in education. UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000391406
Uzorka, A., & Kalabuki, K. (2025). Educational leadership in the digital age: An exploration of technology’s impact on leadership practices. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 11, 101581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.101581
White, R., Lowery, C., & Johnson, J. (2025). Enhancing high-quality education through systemic school leadership: a systematic review. Quality Education for All, 2(1), 227–244. https://doi.org/10.1108/QEA-09-2024-0096
Downloads
-
PDF FULL TEXT
Abstract Dilihat : 16 Kali , Download: 11 Kali
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Ai Asiah (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Ai Asiah

