Komunikasi Krisis Dan Kontestasi Data Dalam Isu Dugaan Pencemaran Lingkungan Pt Iwip Di Halmahera Tengah

Authors

  • ID M. Zulfikar Ismail Program Studi Magister Ilmu Komunikasi, Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, Universitas Muhammadiyah Jakarta Indonesia Author
  • ID Sukendi Program Studi Magister Ilmu Komunikasi, Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, Universitas Muhammadiyah Jakarta Indonesia Author
  • ID Tria Patrianti Program Studi Magister Ilmu Komunikasi, Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, Universitas Muhammadiyah Jakarta Indonesia Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.66914/6knt2d72

Keywords:

crisis communication, risk communication, IWIP, Sagea River, organizational reputation, ESG, media monitoring., komunikasi krisis, komunikasi risiko, IWIP, Sungai Sagea, reputasi organisasi, ESG, media monitoring.

Abstract

Penelitian ini menganalisis komunikasi krisis PT Indonesia Weda Bay Industrial Park (IWIP) dalam isu dugaan pencemaran lingkungan, krisis air bersih, ISPA, konflik lahan, dan menurunnya kepercayaan publik di Halmahera Tengah, Maluku Utara. Kasus ini penting dikaji karena krisis yang muncul tidak hanya berkaitan dengan persoalan teknis lingkungan, tetapi juga menyangkut reputasi organisasi, legitimasi industri nikel, dan relasi antara perusahaan, pemerintah, media, organisasi masyarakat sipil, serta masyarakat terdampak. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan metode studi kasus. Data dikumpulkan melalui media monitoring terhadap korpus pemberitaan online periode 2022–2026, dokumen resmi perusahaan, laporan organisasi masyarakat sipil, artikel ilmiah, serta wawancara dengan Dinas Lingkungan Hidup Halmahera Tengah. Analisis dilakukan menggunakan Situational Crisis Communication Theory, Image Repair Theory, Crisis and Emergency Risk Communication, Framing Theory, Social Amplification of Risk Framework, Stakeholder Salience Theory, dan Legitimacy Theory. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa krisis IWIP berkembang sebagai krisis reputasi ekologis yang ditandai oleh pertarungan narasi antara pemberitaan media, laporan NGO, klarifikasi pemerintah daerah, dan respons perusahaan melalui bantahan, CSR, ESG, serta program lingkungan. Strategi komunikasi IWIP cenderung menggunakan pola denial, diminish, bolstering, dan corrective action. Efektivitas komunikasi tersebut masih menghadapi tantangan karena terdapat kesenjangan antara data teknis, persepsi risiko warga, dan kepercayaan publik. Penelitian ini menegaskan bahwa komunikasi krisis dalam industri ekstraktif memerlukan transparansi data, dialog partisipatif, empati terhadap warga terdampak, audit independen, serta media monitoring berkelanjutan.

Kata kunci: komunikasi krisis, komunikasi risiko, IWIP, Sungai Sagea, reputasi organisasi, ESG, media monitoring.

Abstract

This study analyzes the crisis communication of PT Indonesia Weda Bay Industrial Park (IWIP) in relation to alleged environmental pollution, clean water crisis, acute respiratory infections, land conflicts, and declining public trust in Central Halmahera, North Maluku. This case is important because the crisis is not merely a technical environmental issue but also concerns organizational reputation, legitimacy of the nickel industry, and relations among corporations, government, media, civil society organizations, and affected communities. This research uses a qualitative case study approach. Data were collected through media monitoring of online news coverage from 2022 to 2026, corporate documents, civil society reports, scientific articles, and an interview with the Environmental Agency of Central Halmahera. The analysis applies Situational Crisis Communication Theory, Image Repair Theory, Crisis and Emergency Risk Communication, Framing Theory, Social Amplification of Risk Framework, Stakeholder Salience Theory, and Legitimacy Theory. The findings indicate that IWIP’s crisis has developed into an ecological reputation crisis marked by contested narratives among media reports, NGO findings, government clarification, and corporate responses through denial, CSR, ESG narratives, and environmental programs. IWIP’s communication strategies tend to involve denial, diminish, bolstering, and corrective action. Their effectiveness remains challenged by gaps between technical data, community risk perception, and public trust. This study argues that crisis communication in extractive industries requires data transparency, participatory dialogue, empathy toward affected communities, independent audits, and continuous media monitoring.

Keywords: crisis communication, risk communication, IWIP, Sagea River, organizational reputation, ESG, media monitoring.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Austin, L., Liu, B. F., & Jin, Y. (2012). How audiences seek out crisis information: Exploring the social-mediated crisis communication model. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 40(2), 188–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909882.2012.654498

Benoit, W. L. (1997). Image repair discourse and crisis communication. Public Relations Review, 23(2), 177–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0363-8111(97)90023-0

Bidul, S., & Widowaty, Y. (2023). Analisis yuridis dampak pencemaran lingkungan pertambangan mangan dan nikel di Provinsi Maluku Utara. JUSTISI, 9(3), 412–426. https://doi.org/10.33506/js.v9i3.2768

Coombs, W. T. (2007). Protecting organization reputations during a crisis: The development and application of Situational Crisis Communication Theory. Corporate Reputation Review, 10(3), 163–176. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.crr.1550049

Deegan, C. (2002). Introduction: The legitimising effect of social and environmental disclosures: A theoretical foundation. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 15(3), 282–311. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513570210435852

Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x

Haya, A., Alkatiri, H., & Halil, A. (2022). Kajian perubahan kualitas air di kawasan lingkar tambang Halmahera Tengah Provinsi Maluku Utara. Jurnal GEOMining, 3(2), 84–91.

Imran, M., Castillo, C., Diaz, F., & Vieweg, S. (2015). Processing social media messages in mass emergency: A survey. ACM Computing Surveys, 47(4), Article 67. https://doi.org/10.1145/2771588

Indonesia Weda Bay Industrial Park. (2024). Environmental, social and governance report 2024. PT Indonesia Weda Bay Industrial Park.

Jaringan Advokasi Tambang. (2024). IWIP sebagai etalase kejahatan strategis nasional negara-korporasi: Penaklukan dan perampokan Halmahera. JATAM.

Kasperson, R. E., Renn, O., Slovic, P., Brown, H. S., Emel, J., Goble, R., Kasperson, J. X., & Ratick, S. (1988). The social amplification of risk: A conceptual framework. Risk Analysis, 8(2), 177–187. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1988.tb01168.x

Maulida, R. A. (2021). Implementasi Teori Komunikasi Krisis Situasional pada kasus Covid-19 oleh Pemerintah Provinsi Jawa Barat melalui @pikobar_jabar. Jurnal Pekommas, 6(1), 83–93. https://doi.org/10.30818/jpkm.2021.2060109

Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853–886. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1997.9711022105

Nexus3 Foundation. (2025). Dampak lanjutan dari aktivitas industri nikel di Teluk Weda, Halmahera Tengah, Maluku Utara, Indonesia. Nexus3 Foundation.

Reynolds, B., & Seeger, M. W. (2005). Crisis and emergency risk communication as an integrative model. Journal of Health Communication, 10(1), 43–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730590904571

Saputra, A. R., Faliana, C., Durahman, M. A., & Ginting, P. (2023). Dilema Halmahera di tengah industri nikel. Perkumpulan Aksi Ekologi dan Emansipasi Rakyat.

Solihin, O. (2021). Implementasi big data pada sosial media sebagai strategi komunikasi krisis pemerintah. Jurnal Common, 5(1), 56–66. https://doi.org/10.34010/common.v5i1.5123

Stieglitz, S., Mirbabaie, M., Ross, B., & Neuberger, C. (2018). Social media analytics: Challenges in topic discovery, data collection, and data preparation. International Journal of Information Management, 39, 156–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2017.12.002

Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–610. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9508080331

Downloads

Published

2026-07-11